Główna treść artykułu


The authors aim to answer the research question: ‘What do you miss most about online education?’. The rationale for the research is that this form of education is likely to continue to be used. Referring to the quality strategy, the authors concentrate on the meaning of words used in responses to the above-mentioned open question, which was part of the research on the ‘Socio-technological aspects of academic education during the pandemic – from an international perspective’. The tool used was an electronic questionnaire, which was completed by 796 respondents from Poland, including 678 students and 118 academic teachers, as well as 41 students from Kenya. The questionnaire consisted of 31 closed and 6 open questions. The responses of Polish students and academic teachers, as well as Kenyan students, indicate the following categories: ‘contact’, ‘organisation’ and ‘technical dimension’. It forms an image of a specifically understood craft, work performed in separation, and the place of residence. The component in the form of modern technologies only modernises the educational process but does not make it satisfactory for either party of the aforementioned social relationship. The conclusion that can be drawn from the research is as follows: in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, the primary task is to reorganise the contact between students and academic teachers in such a way that it is possible to achieve the assumed learning outcomes.

Słowa kluczowe

academic education, learning process, Covid-19 pandemic academic education, learning process, COVID-19 pandemic

Szczegóły artykułu

Jak cytować
Babicka-Wirkus, A. ., Cywiński, A., Muoki Joshua, S., & Walat, W. (2022). Gaps in online education in the times of a pandemic in the opinion of Polish and Kenyan students. Dyskursy Młodych Andragogów/Adult Education Discourses, (22), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.34768/dma.vi22.618


  1. Kibaru F. & Njoroge R. (2013), Exploring the feasibility of a web-based learning community system for professional development of e-learning faculty in the context of higher education in Kenya, “Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference”, pp. 627-630.
  2. Makokha G.L. & Mutisya D.N. (2016), Status of e-learning in public universities in Kenya, “International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning”, 17(3), pp. 341-359.
  3. Mendel M. (2006), Pedagogika miejsca i animacja na miejsce wrażliwa, w: Pedagogika miejsca, M. Mendel (ed.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej Edukacji TWP we Wrocławiu, Wrocław, pp. 21-37.
  4. Mulwa A.S. (2012), The influence of institutional and human factors on readiness to adopt e-learning in Kenya: the case of secondary schools in Kitui district, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
  5. Muuro M.E., Wagacha W.P., Oboko R. & Kihoro J. (2014), Students’ perceived challenges in an online collaborative learning environment: A case of higher learning institutions in Nairobi, Kenya, “International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning”, 15(6), pp. 132-161.
  6. Namisiko P., Munialo C. & Nyongesa S. (2014), Towards an optimization framework for e-learning in developing countries: A case of private universities in Kenya, “Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology”, 2(2), pp. 131-148.
  7. Onamu A. (2020),Mobile data prices around the world compared to Kenya, “Gadgets Africa”, https://gadgets-africa.com/2020/07/20/mobile-data-prices-around-the-world/, 20.07.2020.
  8. Speck O. (2005), Być nauczycielem. Trudności wychowawcze w czasie zmian społeczno-kulturowych, translation: E. Cieślik, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
  9. Strelau J. (2000), Psychologia, tom 2, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.